2020. 2. 21. 22:33ㆍ카테고리 없음
Our Handmade Home: How to. Identify an Old Singer Sewing Machine.We wait for you here with a lot of material that will make us better. Designs Throughout The Years Singer treadle sewing machines are one of the most popular Singer antiques, and are still regularly found in auctions and antique dealers today. Regards, Brian Harris Hello Alex, I have tried a lot of places to date my singer and finally ran into your website. I'm still researching that aspect. Next you will find the range of numbers that your Singer serial number falls between. Singer Sewing Machine Serial Numbers One Letter PrefixIn perfect working order and recently been serviced.
Any assistance you could provide would be greatly appreciated. My machine is a hand crank and does not have a serial number, it also says The Avenue on it instead of Singer. The receipt is dated november 18th 1926, from Singer Sewing Machine Co. Some people mail me to say they have a receipt from 1950 so how could my guide have their machine as made in 1948 or 1949? I wonder how many of her 250,000 twin sisters are still around. Cyndy Kitt ProductionsThere are many manuals there for anyone looking.
Where it was made: To find out where your machine was manufactured, check the letter prefix: if it has a single letter prefix. For example 401A, 2010, 185J, 201, 301, 221k, etc. Check out the post above and follow all the tips and links I have put up here thats all I do anyway The instructions above are for domestic, pre-electric models, and the most important thing you need is the serial number, but even if you don't have it there is another website linked above that can help. I have been looking for this exact type of info for a long time and it just took me a couple of minutes to get it all by following your instructions. These letter are before the serial numbers. Comprehensive Singer Serial Number DatabaseThe machine cost 14pounds, ten shillings. If you don't have a complete serial number: Here are some other identifying methods: If you have part of the number you can check the year of your machine on the, just follow directions depending on whether your machine has a 2, 1 or 0 letter prefix.
It includes the Singer Buttonholer, Zig Zag, Blind Stich Attachments and another box of various attachments. Still may be worth some money!
I've just come across a receipt for my grans treadle machine, checked the sites you recommend and I can see it was made in Scotland in 1922. We'll always be honest and let you know what we are being paid to review or advertise, the words are always our own. I would imagine that the rest of the records weren't computerised until the 80's. How to Identify A Singer Sewing Machine By the Serial NumberGet a piece of aluminum foil crumple it up in to a little ball, a small bowl of water and then dip the foil in to the water. Thanks so much for your help and your interest and all the fun and fascinating comments. Isaac Singer was the founder of the company, and was the first to create treadle powered, belt powdered and eventually electricity powered machines.
She loved it and took such great care of it that now that I have adopted it all I had to do was identify the model and find a manual, just to learn how to maintain it. One of the reasons is not only due to the rich history, but the fact that they cater to all sewing needs. After 1900 all Singers had a letter prefix before the serial number. It feels a bit oily all over but I don't want to mess up the decals. How to Identify A Singer Sewing Machine By the Serial NumberThis one works like a charm, just trying to remember how to thread the bobbin! Her charm is not diminished by the knowledge that she isn't worth much monetarily, she belonged to the mother of the yard sale proprietor and was used to make her own and all 6 of her sibling's clothes through the 1920's and 1930's.
Not pretentious Sokan talk English, but we must truly international language mastered to communicate. It works pretty good but needs a good clean and the tension sorting. Wonder if there is a market to sell it in South East Michigan. You can still follow my guide on how to clean your machine if it helps you get your girl up and running again, I wish you many years of happiness together Ann x Hi, i looked at your websites and i cannot find out exactly when the singer that i have was made. Singer Featherweight 221My mom, who's 92 and still going strong, bought it the year my brother was born and now it's come to roost in my home. I have an old singer sewing machine, foot pedal operated. No Prefix Serial Numbers - Comprehensive Singer Sewing Machine Serial Number Database.
It's a wonder that someone didn't figure that out earlier. The cabinet style or how a machine is powered has no bearing on the model of a machine, so serial or model numbers on cabinets or motors should not be mistaken for those of the machine. Do you recommend professional cleaning?
Note: when two serial numbers are on the machine use the larger of the serial numbers. Singer 211G model 211 made in Germany Singer 211U model 211 made in Japan.
18 January 1871The third and final act of German unification was the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-71, orchestrated by Bismarck to draw the western German states into alliance with the North GermanConfederation. With the French defeat, the German Empire was proclaimed in January 1871 in the Palace at Versailles, France. From this point forward, foreign policy of the German Empire was madein Berlin, with the German Kaiser (who was also the King of Prussia) accrediting ambassadors of foreign nations.The effect on the economy through a new political constitution and administration is hardly ever more evident with the emergence of the Empire. As an example of the dimension of the profits to beobtained at a conversion of the merchant called Hermann Geber, the sewing machine factory, formerly Frister & Rossmann, bought it for about 70.000 Thaler and a little later it brought tothe stock exchange for 865.000 Thaler. June 1874From a German newspaper say: fabricated for family use and commercial purposes with the principal U.S.
Aid machine, stand in their performance and duration as unmatched. Of these machines forover 10,000 units have been proven to the complete satisfaction of the Imperial General Post Office, several Royals, Ministries and governments and most of the German Railways direction relativeto their officials, after the various experts they are 'excellent in every respect' after careful consideration for recognition. Every genuine Frister & Rossmann machine bears the fullcompany name on the badge and the F & R in the frame. 10 February 1875On the 10th of February, 1875, Mr writes to Frister & Rossmann at Berlin asking to be considered astheir agent for England. On the following day Frister & Rossmann replied that they had not intention of sending a traveller to London, and must leave him to make the best use he could of hisactivity, adding, ' We had certainly not hitherto given you our representation for England. Should you wish to sell our machines on commission during your stay in England, we await your visitwith a view to further conversation on the subject.' The new agent for the company.It is possible Frister & Rossmann approached Mr.
Hermann Loog because not entirely satisfied of Mr. Isidor Nasch, but for sure Mr. Loog induced Frister & Rossmann to confide to him thesole sale of their machines for England and the Colonies and he insisted on their trade mark being attached to every one of their machines.
Hermann Loog, who was a considerable retailer andhave been in Gresham Street of the City of London for thirteen year, moved his retail business as agent for the German company to 128 London Wall. Few year later at 127-128London Wall and in 1885 the premises of Hermann Loog Ltd. Occupying three newly-built warehouses at.
According to a letter from Mr Hermann Loog as a reply to Mr Isidor Nasch, the Frister & Rossmann in 1876 approached him, to take up their agency, which had then beenunsuccessfully held in succession by two London firms. Mr. Berlin Industrial ExpositionIn 1879 a large exhibition was set in an exhibition park created near the Lehrte Station. The exhibition was not only a show of technological advancements but it was also created as anamusement park.One of the main attractions of the event was the first electric locomotive from Siemens & Halske. Originally built for use in a coal mine, it pulled three small cars fitted with woodenbenches, each car being capable of carrying six passengers for a ride along a 300-meter circular track. Electrical power was supplied to a third rail from a nearby generating station. During thefour months of the exhibition, it carried 90,000 passengers.
The original locomotive is now displayed at the Deutsches Museum in Munich and a replica is shown at the German Museumof Technology (Berlin). June 1879Hermann Loog who was acting as an agent for the Sewing Machine Company, later Frister & Rossmann, since 1876, in a letter sent to F&R dated June 1879, he announcing the transference ofhis private business to the company Hermann Loog Limited.This letter was read, and in it Mr. Loog mentioned that owing to the dispute with the Singer Company and impending dispute with his former capitalist, he thoughtit advisable to turn his business into a company, because in the event of non-success in these actions all his opponents would have to go against for costs or damages would be ' Hermann Loog, hisbones and skin.' Frister & Rossmann REPORTThe report of the Nahmaschienen Fabrik (formerly Frister & Rossmann) Actien Gesellschaft, for 1883, records a steady increase in sales and gratifying extensionof agencies in various parts of the world.
Owing, however, to certain new buildings and plant not having yet been completed, the manufacture of machines has been somewhat restricted, and a temporary decline of the dividend from 6 per cent, in 1882, to 4 per cent, in 1883, has been the result.Also F&R opened a number of retail branch establishments in London and in the country. All those branches were supplied with machines by Hermann Loog from F&R stock held by him. 1884 3 AprilHOW STRIKES ARE MANAGED IN GERMANYThe well-known Sewing Machine Manufactory of Frister & Rossmann was closed for a number of weeks in consequence of a strike, which deserves to be commented upon from more than one point ofview. We have obtained from Mr. Herman Loog, of 127 and 128, London Wall, their sole agent for Great Britain and the Colonies, the following particulars, which we think will interest ourreaders, and especially the numerous customers of the firm.It was generally believed that the people employed in this large factory were well paid and well treated; and from the periodical excursions arranged by Directors, not only for the 1,400 handsactually employed, but also for their families, as well as from general appearances it was thought that the relations between employer and employed were exceptionally happy. It was therefore amatter of great surprise, when, on the third of April, it became known that a strike had broken out among the workpeople of this factory, which through its agency at 127 and 128, London Wall, iswell known not only to the English trade, but also in many thousand English homes where the F. Machine has become a household word.
On the third of April, a couple of hundred men, mostlySocialists, on being refused compliance with the ridiculous claims they had put forward, stormed the spacious workshop, and, armed with bludgeons, called upon the workpeople generally to take upthe strike; those who refused were literally driven out by force. For the next week or so, a few honest men who were anxious to continue their work were waylaid in the streets, and broken headsand bones soon reduced so considerably the number of those willing and anxious to continue their work, that at last the Directors closed the factory entirely, especially as they were unable toobtain from the German Government any protection for the safety of their honest workpeople. Brute force reigned supreme, under the very eyes of the police; the streets in the neighbourhood ofthe factory were the scenes of daily and bloody battles.
The rebels, thus positively winked at by the police, managed moreover to spread about the false report that the average wages amounted toless than twelve shillings per week, and were intended to be still further reduced by twenty per cent. The publication of these falsehoods and the connivance of the police soon brought together acommittee for the collection of funds, to assist those on strike. In vain did the directors apply for the police protection. The German parliament was about to be asked to renew the socialisticlaws; so, in high quarters it was evidently deemed desirable to nurse these dreadful disturbances for the purpose of being able to point them out, as the best proof for the necessity of theselaws.For when that object had been obtained it was shown to be the easiest possible thing for the Berlin police to put down instantly the disgraceful uproars of the past weeks. In the meantime theDirectors of Frister & Rossmann had invited the strike committee to inspect their wages accounts, when it was ascertained that the average wages for the last three years amounted totwenty-four shillings per week (of under sixty hours) per head; and let it be well understood, that this average includes several hundreds of labourers, boys and girls, at moderate wages, whilstit does not include the foremen. It was also conclusively shown that the intended reduction of wages was a mere myth.The strike committee, therefore, could not but admit that the strike itself was frivolous in the extreme, and they withdrew their assistance.
Thus ended a most disastrous misunderstanding betweenemployer and employed; a misunderstanding which, but for the unprincipled conduct of the German police authorities, would never have existed at all. By sending the ringleaders of this mostmischievous affair to prison for three months, the German police cannot repair the wrong they have done to the families of some hundreds who would have worked, but for the reign pro tern of bruteforce. The factory is now again in full work, doing their best to dispose, as quickly as possible, of an accumulation of orders. 1st MARCH 1885Frister & Rossmann, not being satisfied with the nature of the retail businesses as carried on by Hermann Loog, anarrangement was entered into by which the Limited Company took upon itself the whole of the liabilities of management and assets of the various retail businesses, and by an agreement, dated 1stMarch, 1885, between H. Loog & Co., Limited, and Frister & Rossmann, all these businesses, stock, assets, and liabilities were transferred to H. Loog & Co., payment being given forthe stock and interest which Frister & Rossmann had in these businesses by debenture in H.
Frister And Rossmann Serial Numbers
Loog & Co., Limited, to the amount of about £23,000, and the arrangement was that Loog & Co.were to be supplied with 500 machines and other goods from month to month. All machines to be sold or let out on hire; when sold, were then charged against H. Loog & Co., Limited, in thebooks, and from time to time bills were drawn by Frister & Rossmann upon H. Loog & Co., Limited, to be renewed at six days' date, and in addition fresh debentures were to be given by H.Loog & Co. To cover these bills. As a matter of fact some £6,000 or £7,000 of the original debentures have been paid off since 1885, but a very large additional debt has been incurred forwhich either debentures or acceptances have been given by H. Loog & Co., Limited.
The amount of the original indebtedness now stands increased to some £33,000 or £34,000. On 1st March, 1885,and the same date as the agreement between Frister & Rossmann and H. Loog & Co., Limited, an agreement was entered into between Frister & Rossmann and H. Loog himself. By thisagreement it was provided. Americans can judge of the extent to which sewing machine manufacture is pushed in Europe by the recent celebrations in the factories upon the completion of a certain number ofmachines.
Frister & Rossmann recently had a jolly time over their 500,000th machine, and now the sewing machine factory of Rezler and Komarek, atVienna, has celebrated the making of the 10,000th machine. These occasions may seem to warrant rapturous outbursts of enthusiasm to our European friends, but with us, millions ofsewing machines have been made and sold without our feeling the need of any particular demonstration. The Yankee temperament does not grow enthusiastic over small matters.Sewing Machine News. MAY 1887 Frister & Rossmann general assemblyOn the afternoon of the 17 th May 1887, an ordinary general assembly of the shareholders of the Frister & RossmannCompany was held.The President of the Council of Supervision, Mr. Sigismund Born, informed the assembly that the Board of directors had tendered their admission to the council and the members ofthe said council equally intended to tender their resignations in the case of the majority of the shareholders supposing this action to be serving the interests of the business.see more.
4 August 1914, United Kingdom declared war on the German EmpireOn August 20, 1914 the Allied Powers began an embargo on important items that were normally shipped to and from Germany.At first, the U.S. Pursued a policy which, although formally neutral,penalized Germany and aided its British and French foes.
Britain imposed a trade embargo on Germany which, with very little U.S. Protest at its infringements of neutral rights, ended up chokingoff American exports of food, cotton, and other resources to Germany. Meanwhile, the U.S. Permitted all belligerents – which, in practice, meant Britain and France – to purchase munitions fromthe U.S. And, later, to borrow significant sums of money from New York banks.
When Germany, in response to the British embargo, began to use submarines to attack British merchant vessels on whichAmericans might be sailing, the U.S. Vigorously objected that submarine warfare of this sort was a flagrant “violation of many sacred principles of justice and humanity.” Protests (including bythe secretary of state) that these and other measures were one-sided were met with with accusations of disloyalty and anti-Americanism. Over the next year, the U.S.
Tightened the screws, issuingan ultimatum to Germany in 1916 to restrict submarine warfare or face the severance of diplomatic relations. A year later, when Wilson was safely reelected and antiwar voices hadbeen further stilled or intimidated, the trap snapped shut: the Germans, now foreseeing that the U.S.
Would enter the war, decided to resume unrestricted submarine warfare. Wilson, outraged atwhat he considered the breaking of a promise, broke diplomatic relations, armed U.S. Merchant ships, and, after several of the latter were then sunk, called on Congress to declare war.
Whatfollowed was a comprehensive mobilization of American resources, with an eye toward large-scale combat operations against Germany. After World War I, Germany was forced to pay all of the war reparations after the Treaty of Versailles(France), signed on 28 June1919, came into force on 10 January 1920.Reparations were the payments and transfers of property and equipment that Germany was forced to make following its defeat. Article 231 of the Treaty (the 'warguilt' clause) declared Germany and its allies responsible for all 'loss and damage' suffered by the Allies during the war and provided the basis for reparations.Britain had suffered little land devastation during the war and Prime Minister David Lloyd George supported reparations to a lesser extent than the French. Britain began to look on a restoredGermany as an important trading partner and worried about the effect of reparations on the British economy. In January 1921, the total sum due was decided by an Inter-Allied Reparations Commission and was set at 269 billion gold marks (the equivalent of around 100,000 tonnes of pure gold). This100,000 tonnes of gold is equivalent to more than 50% of all the gold ever mined in history (est. 165000 tonnes) which was clearly not within the means of the Germans to pay.The war and the treaty were followed by the Hyper-inflation of the early 1920s that wreaked havoc on Germany's social structure and political stability.
During that inflation, the value ofthe nation's currency, the Papiermark, collapsed from 8.9 per US$1 in 1918 to 4.2 trillion per US$1 by November 1923. Prosperity reigned 1923–29, supported by large bank loans from New York.